Section 216 of the Insolvency Act 1986

Specialist guidance on the re-use of company names following insolvent liquidation and the restrictions on directors.
Contact Us Today

How Justitia can help directors with the re-use of a company name

Specialist and practical support at every stage.

What is a prohibited name under S216?

Any name by which the liquidated company was known in the 12 months preceding liquidation, including trading names/styles, or any similar name which suggests an association with the liquidated company.

Who does S216 apply to?

Any person who was a director/shadow director of the liquidated company in the 12 months preceding liquidation.

Extent of the restriction

Prohibits directors/shadow directors of the liquidated company from being a director of, or being involved in the management of, a new entity using the same/similar name to the liquidated company. To act in contravention of S216 is a criminal offence, and can result in a fine and/or imprisonment, director disqualification and, potentially, being held liable for debts of the new company.

How long does the restriction last?

A period of five years after the date of liquidation.

Exceptions to S216

  • Where the new entity purchases the whole, or substantially the whole of the business in liquidation, from the Liquidator (Rule 22.4 of the Insolvency Rules 2016).
  • Court application made within seven days of the date of liquidation (Rule 22.6 of the Insolvency Rules 2016).
  • Where a director was involved in a company using a similar name which has been trading for at least 12 months prior to the liquidation (Rule 22.7 of the Insolvency Rules 2016).

How can Justitia help you?

Where the new entity purchases the whole, or substantially the whole of the business in liquidation, from the Liquidator (Rule 22.4 of the Insolvency Rules 2016), Justitia will guide you through the process. We will liaise with the Liquidator and the director throughout the process, thus ensuring that what becomes a prohibited name under S216 can be used legitimately in a new entity going forward.

The restriction explained

Under Section 216 of the Insolvency Act 1986, it is a strict criminal offence for a person who was a director or shadow director of a company in the 12 months before it went into insolvent liquidation to be involved in a new business with the same or a similar name.
How we help: Justitia assists directors in navigating these severe restrictions. We provide specialist advice and assistance with one of the statutory exceptions (purchase of the business from the liquidator with proper notice) in order to avoid potential criminal liability, director disqualification and personal liability for the new company’s debts.

Require Section 216 Guidance?

Speak directly with our specialist, Diane Dunion, for confidential and expert advice on the re-use of a company name and Section 216 compliance.
Direct Phone
07947 521923
Email Diane Dunion
[email protected]

Why use Justitia’s services to re-use a company name

A rare specialism handled with speed, clarity and commercial judgement.

Specialist knowledge

Section 216 is a niche and often misunderstood area of insolvency law. We deal with it day in, day out.

Speed and deadlines

The process under Rule 22.4 is extremely time-critical. We will ensure that the process is followed compliantly and completed by the statutory deadline.

Clear Communication

We explain the process in plain language and maintain a clear line of communication with directors throughout the process.

Discreet and confidential

We handle every matter sensitively and confidentially, protecting your position throughout.

Our Section 216 process

A clear, time-critical process for keeping directors on the right side of the restriction.
1

Initial consultation

We take the full picture — the company that failed, the proposed new venture, and the name you want to use.
2

Prohibited name assessment

We consider whether the intended name is a prohibited name caught by Section 216, or one so similar as to suggest a connection.
3

Reviewing the exceptions

We assess whether a statutory exception applies — a successor-company purchase, leave of the court, or an established name.
4

Structuring the compliant route

We advise on the safest lawful way forward and map out exactly what needs to happen, and by when.
5

Notices

We prepare the required Notices under Rule 22.4 and ensure that the statutory deadline is adhered to.
6

Completion of Process

We will notify you when the process is completed and provide you with a copy of the relevant Statutory Notice.

Why it is so important to get S216 right

Early and specialist advice ensures that you avoid potential legal action which may follow the re-use of a prohibited name.

Avoid criminal liability

Stay on the right side of the law and avoid the risk of a fine, prosecution or imprisonment.

Protect your personal assets

Prevent personal liability for the debts of a new company under Section 217 of the Insolvency Act 1986.

Keep trading lawfully

Continue a viable business through a compliant route, rather than having to walk away from it.

Preserve your directorship

Reduce the risk of disqualification and the reputational harm that a breach can bring.

Act in time

Move within the strict statutory deadlines so the available exceptions stay open to you.

Clarity and peace of mind

Know exactly where you stand, and what you can and cannot do, before you commit.

What our clients say

Real feedback from directors and insolvency practitioners we have supported through the Section 216 process.

Justitia Legal provided invaluable support when I was closing my previous company and establishing a new one. Specifically, they guided me through the complexities of Section 216 compliance, ensuring that I was able to reuse the company name legally. Their expertise and clarity made an otherwise stressful process manageable, and I would highly recommend their services to others.

Company Director

I want to thank all the team at Justitia Legal for their professional work involved in the re-using of our company name. Nothing was too much trouble for them; their communication and guidance through the whole process was exceptional.

They were true to their quote with no hidden charges. For the amount of work involved, it was excellent value for money. We can highly recommend this company; I cannot fault their service at all.

Company Director

When it comes to navigating statutory compliance and Section 216, Justitia Legal are superb. Their deep understanding of insolvency regulations, fast turnaround times, and meticulous attention to detail take all the friction out of what can otherwise be a complex, time-sensitive process.

They make placing re-use notices effortless, ensuring full legal compliance while providing a smooth, completely dependable service both for the directors involved and ourselves every time. They are a valued partner to our practice, and we recommend them highly.

Insolvency Practitioner

We instructed Justitia Legal in March 2026 to handle a Section 216 application so we could continue trading under an established brand name after the previous holding company went into liquidation. As a business based in Austria dealing with UK insolvency law for the first (and hopefully last) time, we needed a firm that would tell us exactly what to do, and that is what we got.

We had a call the same day we were introduced, and the engagement documents were with us within 24 hours. From there the team ran the process end to end and was consistently quick to respond, often within minutes and well outside office hours. They caught several errors in our paperwork before they became a problem, clearly explained why the application had to be in my own name rather than the company’s, and even posted the creditor letters from their own office because we were abroad. Given the strict 28-day statutory deadline, that proactivity mattered.

The application was completed on time, the Gazette notice was published, and we received a full set of records for our files. Clear communication, no surprises, and a team that kept the deadline in view better than we did. I highly recommend their service!

Company Director

I had an excellent experience with Justitia Legal throughout the liquidation process and with the advice surrounding Section 216. They were knowledgeable, professional and took the time to explain what could have been a very complex and stressful situation in a clear and practical way.

I would highly recommend Justitia Legal to anyone dealing with company insolvency, liquidation, or Section 216 matters. Their expertise and support made a difficult process far more manageable. Thank you to the whole team for your outstanding service.

Director

Facing a Section 216 issue?

Speak to a specialist about your options before you act — early advice is critical.